What is the best investment advice now that the U.S. and its British and French allies have launched targeted military strikes on Syria?
That’s for two reasons. First, you undoubtedly will be too late if you’re selling after seeing headlines that airstrikes are under way, or that Russia has fired back, or worse. Many investment firms have software programs that constantly scour various news feeds for even a mention of such escalation and which immediately begin selling if it detected any. You wouldn’t stand a chance of front-running them.
Second, the stock market’s post-crisis low often represents a good buying opportunity, according to an analysis conducted by Ned Davis Research of the most significant geopolitical crises of the past century. In fact, the firm found, the stock market’s rebound from its post-crisis low is often so powerful that within six months the market is higher than where it stood before that crisis erupted.
These patterns are summarized in the accompanying chart. On average across all 51 geopolitical crises that Ned Davis Research analyzed, the Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA, -0.50% was 3.2% lower one month after the crisis erupted. Yet by six months after the crisis the Dow was higher than where it stood before news of that crisis hit the market — and higher still in 12 months.
Consider the U.S. market’s reaction to the Sep. 11 attacks in 2001, the worst terrorist attack on U.S. soil. At the Dow’s low five trading sessions later, it was 17.5% lower than where it stood the day before those attacks. Less than two months after the attacks, however, the Dow was higher than where it had been on Sep. 10.
By no means do these results mean that investors with an exclusive focus on profits should actually hope for an escalation of U.S. involvement in Syria. The 12-month returns reported in the accompanying chart are close to the average of all 12-month periods since 1896, when the Dow was created. That means that once the market shrugs off a crisis, the market eventually makes it back to where it would have been anyway.
Or, as British economist John Maynard Keynes once put it, once “the storm is long past the ocean is flat again.”
Some may argue that it’s tasteless to even be worrying about their portfolio performance when there is the prospect of a major war. Yet the lesson of history is that such worry is not only tasteless but pointless: your portfolio in one year’s time will likely be just where it would have been anyway.